Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen the public markets melt down over the fears of AI. Public software companies are now trading at 3x revenues (far from the 10x exit multiple assumption in your financial model!).

Several prominent software names are trading down 50%+ YTD. Figma, a public markets darling post IPO, is now down 75% since their IPO in August 2025.

All of this is generally attributed to AI. A few software companies posted weaker than expected earnings, and suddenly everyone decided that these companies were all going to get killed by AI-native startups.

At this point, every time Anthropic releases a new blog post, billions in stock market value gets wiped out.

But while the public markets noise is deafening, a handful of private companies are quietly thriving. Many founders see this as an opportunity to eat the lunch of many of these flailing public competitors.

Building in 2026 is fundamentally different from the “SaaSacre” of the last decade. If the ZIRP era was about buying market share at any cost, this era is about the Barbell of Success: extreme technical differentiation on one end, and extreme shipping velocity on the other. We see these two archetypes as the two blueprints AI startups are leveraging to get ahead.

Anything in between is “Death Valley.”


Archetype 1: The Luminaries (Technological Differentiation)

These are the companies solving the “really hard” problems that require world-class expertise. Their moat isn’t just a head start; it’s the sheer complexity of their research and engineering, which creates a barrier to entry that capital alone cannot bridge. If you actually own your own cutting edge research and breakthroughs, nobody can vibe code their way into copying you.

Some obvious examples include:

The simple answer here is to focus on solving harder problems than anyone else. If you’re willing to tackle the hardest, most complex problems out there, you’re likely going to be alone in the room.

There’s a reason why companies like SpaceX and Palantir have captured massive amounts of value over the last decade (hint: monopolies tend to be lucrative!)


Archetype 2: The Sprinters (Shipping Velocity & Last-Mile Delivery)

On the other end of the barbell are the companies that move faster than the incumbents can even schedule a meeting. Their moat is being closer to the customer problem than anyone else, creating a feedback loop that makes their “last-mile” delivery indispensable.

To be explicit, the common threads here are:

  1. Ship weekly (if not daily). All these founders are working 996 (or more)

  2. Reassess your product roadmap monthly (even quarterly is too slow)

  3. Be more customer obsessed than anyone else (e.g., get constant product feedback, iterate rapidly, trade notes with thought leaders, literally sit down and watch how your customers work, etc.)

  4. Don’t be afraid to burn the boats and disrupt yourself if the writing is on the wall (do not let yourself fall victim to your own innovators dilemma!)


Archetype 3: The “Death Valley” (The No-Man’s Land)

This is the most dangerous place to be in 2026. This bucket is filled with companies that aren’t pushing the technical envelope, but also aren’t shipping weekly or talking to their customers every single day.

Long story short, we think startups need to pick a lane and hammer on their advantage. If you aren’t the smartest guy in the room in 2026, you’d better make damn sure you’re the fastest.


Conclusion: Pick Your Side

The AI revolution is no longer a theoretical debate about AGI; it is a ground war of execution. The “barbell” is real: either be the one inventing the future of intelligence or the one delivering its value to the customer’s front door faster than anyone else.

Whatever you do, don’t get stuck in the middle. Death Valley is getting crowded, and the water is running out.

Subscribe now

Leave a Reply

Sign Up for TheVCDaily

The best news in VC, delivered every day!